Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2023 66 • VG SZ II 2023 66 KI-generiert

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 66
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant challenged a decision by the Office of Labor that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits following a voluntary resignation from their prior employment without a valid reason. The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation: The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einstellung der Arbeitslosenentschädigung Selbstkündigung Arbeitsverhältnis Leistungsanspruch Arbeitslosigkeit Recht auf Abschalten
KI-generiert
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung;