Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2023 59 • VG SZ II 2023 59 KI-generiert

Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual residing abroad appealed a decision by a cantonal compensation office regarding old-age and survivors' insurance concerning compensation claims, arguing that the authority failed to consider relevant evidence submitted in the appeal proceedings, specifically documentation supporting the claimed residence abroad and subsequent employment abroad, which should have been included in the administrative file. The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment: The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung Versicherungsentschädigung Aufenthaltswechsel Sozialversicherungsverfahren ausländische Rente ausländischer Entscheid

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the court fees for the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Dubai - UAE, Zustelladresse: B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz nach