Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn individual residing abroad appealed a decision by a cantonal compensation office regarding old-age and survivors' insurance concerning compensation claims, arguing that the authority failed to consider relevant evidence submitted in the appeal proceedings, specifically documentation supporting the claimed residence abroad and subsequent employment abroad, which should have been included in the administrative file. The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment: The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe provision was cited to regulate the court fees for the appeal.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 59 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. September 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Dubai - UAE, Zustelladresse: B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz nach