Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2023 5 • VG SZ II 2023 5 KI-generiert

Social Security Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Proof

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 5
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A litigant challenged a decision by a social security fund concerning old-age and survivors' insurance benefits, specifically regarding damages, which had been decided by a lower court. The court found that the litigant had failed to meet the burden of proof regarding the factual circumstances necessary to establish entitlement to the claimed benefits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the factual premises supporting the claim were not sufficiently substantiated as required by law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Social Security Benefits Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Proof: The court found that the litigant had failed to meet the burden of proof regarding the factual circumstances necessary to establish entitlement to the claimed benefits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the factual premises supporting the claim were not sufficiently substantiated as required by law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sozialversicherungsleistungen Versicherungsleistungsanspruch Beweislast Altersversicherung Versicherungskasse missbräuchlicher Bezug von Leistungen der Sozialhilfe
KI-generiert
II 2023 51
Social Security Survivor's Benefits Appeal
II 2024 80
Social Security Supplementary Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Unsubstantiated Asset Reductions
II 2020 38
Appeal Against Damage Compensation Order for Bankruptcy-Related Social Security Contributions Upheld Due to Insufficient Substantiation
I 2020 16
Denial of Disability Benefits Affirmed Due to Insufficient Evidence of Impaired Work Capacity
II 2021 96
Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. April 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, \n Bahnhofstrasse 12, 8001 Zürich, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz nach \n