Compensation Office v. Claimant: Repayment of Overpaid Supplementary Benefits Due to Failure to Report Circumstance Changes
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant challenged a decision by the compensation office to reclaim supplementary benefits, where the claimant had not reported changes in personal circumstances that would have affected eligibility. The court upheld the compensation office's decision, reasoning that the claimant was obligated under social insurance law to promptly report any material changes affecting the supplementary benefits, and failure to do so justified the repayment demand for the overpaid amounts.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Compensation Office v. Claimant: Repayment of Overpaid Supplementary Benefits Due to Failure to Report Circumstance Changes: The court upheld the compensation office's decision, reasoning that the claimant was obligated under social insurance law to promptly report any material changes affecting the supplementary benefits, and failure to do so justified the repayment demand for the overpaid amounts.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 28 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: