Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant challenged a decision that suspended their entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the refusal to accept a job assignment. The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertUnemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment: The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 18 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtannahme einer zugewiesenen Arbeit) |\n
\n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: