Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2022 88 • VG SZ II 2022 88 KI-generiert

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 88
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought reinstatement of the deadline to appeal a decision concerning unemployment insurance benefits, specifically regarding short-time work compensation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, after missing the original appeal period. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied: The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Wiederausrichtung von Arbeitslosentaggeldern Fristversäumnis Kurzarbeitsentschädigung statutarische Leistung Arbeitslosigkeit Klagefrist
KI-generiert
II 2021 61
Company Appeal Regarding COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Denial
II 2021 112
Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 47
Company Appeal Regarding Denial of COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Due to Insufficient Documentation
II 2021 15
Company Appeal on Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 3
COVID-19 Unemployment Benefits Appeal

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 88 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Covid-19; Kurzarbeitsentschädigung; Fristwiederherstellung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: