Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2022 87 • VG SZ II 2022 87 KI-generiert

Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits)

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 87
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The petitioner, who was receiving supplementary benefits, was required to transfer ownership of a property to the compensation fund as a condition for receiving those benefits, despite having previously argued that the transfer was unjustified due to an alleged agreement to keep the asset. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits): The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Eigentumsübertragung Ergänzungsleistungen Ausgleichsfonds gesetzliche Voraussetzung Anspruchsvoraussetzung für Versicherungsleistungen Freizügigkeitsabkommen Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.
KI-generiert
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2019 75
Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 87 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: