Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appeal concerned a challenge to a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the calculation of insured earnings for unemployment benefit entitlement, where the appellant argued that certain income components should be included in the calculation base. The court reasoned that established regulations and prior jurisprudence dictate that only income subject to mandatory contributions under the relevant social security legislation can be considered as insured earnings for benefit calculation purposes, and thus upheld the initial determination because the disputed income components did not meet this statutory threshold.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertUnemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Appeal: The court reasoned that established regulations and prior jurisprudence dictate that only income subject to mandatory contributions under the relevant social security legislation can be considered as insured earnings for benefit calculation purposes, and thus upheld the initial determination because the disputed income components did not meet this statutory threshold.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 7 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n