Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2022 62 • VG SZ II 2022 62 KI-generiert

Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 62
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A company appealed a municipal council's decision imposing connection fees for a new sewage system installation, arguing the fees were improperly calculated. The court reasoned that the fees levied by the municipality, intended to cover the costs of providing the public service, were permissible as "causal contributions" under relevant law, provided they adhered to the principle of proportionality and equitable burden sharing among users, thus upholding the local authority's imposition of the connection charges.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees: The court reasoned that the fees levied by the municipality, intended to cover the costs of providing the public service, were permissible as "causal contributions" under relevant law, provided they adhered to the principle of proportionality and equitable burden sharing among users, thus upholding the local authority's imposition of the connection charges.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abwasseranschlussgebühren Verhältnismässigkeit Auferlegung von Verfahrenskosten kommunale Gebietskörperschaft Gemeindeaufgabe Durchleitungsrecht Kausalabgaben (Anschlussgebühren Kanalisation Neubau) | Kausalabgaben
KI-generiert
III 2023 10
Property Owner v. Municipality on Sewage Connection Fee Assessment
II 2023 29
Challenge to Sewage Connection Fees Based on Benefit Equalization
II 2010 50
Appeal Regarding Development Contributions for Electrical and Sewage Infrastructure Costs.
II 2018 4
Property Owner v. Municipal Council (Sewage and Refuse Fees Assessment)
II 2017 108
Sewage Fee and Permit Fee Appeal on Building Modifications

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 62 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat U.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Anschlussgebühren Kanalisation Neubau) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: