Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2022 59 • VG SZ II 2022 59 KI-generiert

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their disability pension under a mandatory occupational pension scheme, specifically challenging the degree of disability (IV-Grad) used for the calculation. The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Festsetzung der Invalidenrente Altersversorgungssystem sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit Beurteilungskriterien obligatorische Vorsorge Invaliditätsversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 14. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Invalidenrente: Berechnung IV-Grad) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: