Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2021 96 • VG SZ II 2021 96 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a social insurance institution's decision regarding survivors' benefits and a claim for damages under the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance scheme. The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution: The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Hinterlassenenversicherung Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung Schadensersatzklage Altersversicherung Wiederaufleben des Anspruchs statutarische Leistung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 96 + 97 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ \n (Verfahren II 2021 96) |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Sozialversicherungsanstalt (SVA) Zürich, Röntgenstrasse 17, Postfach, 8087 Zürich, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz gemäss