Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2021 76 • VG SZ II 2021 76 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 76
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An insured individual appealed a decision by the employment office to discontinue unemployment benefits due to insufficient job search efforts. The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute): The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arbeitslosenentschädigung Leistungseinstellung Schadenminderungspflicht bei Arbeitslosigkeit Versicherungsleistungsanspruch verursachter Arbeitsplatzverlust Arbeitslosigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
KI-generiert
II 2021 24
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefits Cessation
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung; ungenügende Arbeits-bemühungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: