Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2021 39 • VG SZ II 2021 39 KI-generiert

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 39
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A holding company appealed the tax assessment for 2017 regarding the refusal to recognize value adjustments as tax-deductible expenses for profit and capital tax purposes. The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans: The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Berichtigung des Vorsteuerabzugs Kapitalsteuer Steuerbehörde Steuerveranlagungen Holdinggesellschaft entgangener Gewinn
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n

\n \n Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Schwyz \n Kammer II \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 39 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ Holding AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch …, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Gewinnund Kapitalsteuer (Veranlagung 2017; Aufrechnung Wertberichtigungen) |\n \n\n

\n

\n Sachverhalt: