Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2021 126 • VG SZ II 2021 126 KI-generiert

Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Capital Gain from Isolated Sale of Immovable Property

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 126
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Taxpayers appealed their 2017 income and asset tax assessment concerning the tax treatment of a significant capital gain realized upon the sale of real estate, where the dispute centered on whether the profit qualified as income from movable or immovable property for taxation purposes. The court reasoned that since the real estate was held for purely private purposes and the sale was an isolated transaction not constituting commercial real estate dealing, the capital gain derived from the sale of immovable property was subject to cantonal and communal property gains tax regulations, and therefore, the specific tax treatment sought by the taxpayers, treating it as income from movable assets, was not permissible under the relevant tax law framework.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStV; Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Capital Gain from Isolated Sale of Immovable Property: The court reasoned that since the real estate was held for purely private purposes and the sale was an isolated transaction not constituting commercial real estate dealing, the capital gain derived from the sale of immovable property was subject to cantonal and communal property gains tax regulations, and therefore, the specific tax treatment sought by the taxpayers, treating it as income from movable assets, was not permissible under the relevant tax law framework.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Grundstückgewinn Kauf im kaufmännischen Verkehr Steuerveranlagungen Liegenschaftssteuer Steuerbehörde Objektsteuer

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStV

Costs were imposed on the appellant according to this provision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 126 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Veranlagung 2017) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: