Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2021 124 • VG SZ II 2021 124 KI-generiert

Mandatory Health Insurer Not Obligated to Cover Narcotics Control Fee Without Explicit Statutory Inclusion

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 124
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over an insurance provider's obligation to cover the costs of a "control fee for narcotics according to ALT" related to medical treatment. The insured party sought reimbursement for these costs from their mandatory health insurer. The court reasoned that the specific regulation cited, which covers the fee for monitoring controlled substances, must be read in conjunction with the underlying legal framework defining covered medical services; absent a clear stipulation within the mandatory health insurance law or its implementing ordinances that explicitly includes this specific administrative control fee as a reimbursable benefit, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expense, despite its potential necessity for administering prescribed medication.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Mandatory Health Insurer Not Obligated to Cover Narcotics Control Fee Without Explicit Statutory Inclusion: The insured party sought reimbursement for these costs from their mandatory health insurer. The court reasoned that the specific regulation cited, which covers the fee for monitoring controlled substances, must be read in conjunction with the underlying legal framework defining covered medical services; absent a clear stipulation within the mandatory health insurance law or its implementing ordinances that explicitly includes this specific administrative control fee as a reimbursable benefit, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expense, despite its potential necessity for administering prescribed medication.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückerstattung der Krankenversicherung obligatorische Krankenpflegeversicherung Überversicherung Verwaltungsgebühr medizinische Behandlung Leistungsfreiheit des Versicherers
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 124 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Kostenübernahme 'Kontrollgebühr Betäubungsmittel gemäss ALT') |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: