Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2021 115 • VG SZ II 2021 115 KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 115
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party sought supplementary benefits but was later required to repay a portion of the benefits received after the relevant income assessment period, as the initial calculation did not account for subsequent income earned during that period. The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income: The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Anspruch auf Ergänzungsleistungen Leistungsberechnung Einkommensfestsetzung Rückerstattung von Arbeitslosengeldern Arbeitsentgelt Lohnfortzahlung Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) | Ergänzungsleistungen
KI-generiert
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2018 33
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Hypothetical Income Imputation for Non-Working Spouse
II 2021 88
Spousal Income Imputation in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2020 33
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Office (Repayment of Overpaid Benefits Due to Undisclosed Inheritance)
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: