Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2021 109 • VG SZ II 2021 109 KI-generiert

Company Reimbursement Claim for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Allowance Upheld

Geschäftsnummer II 2021 109
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A company sought reimbursement for COVID-19 short-time work allowances from the relevant labor authority, but the authority rejected the application, which was subsequently upheld by the first instance court. The company appealed this decision, arguing that the necessary prerequisites for receiving the benefit were met despite the government's directive suspending certain commercial activities. The court, however, affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the company failed to sufficiently demonstrate that the downturn in business was directly caused by the pandemic-related official measures, as opposed to other general economic factors, which is a requisite for receiving the special COVID-19 short-time work compensation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Company Reimbursement Claim for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Allowance Upheld: The company appealed this decision, arguing that the necessary prerequisites for receiving the benefit were met despite the government's directive suspending certain commercial activities. The court, however, affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the company failed to sufficiently demonstrate that the downturn in business was directly caused by the pandemic-related official measures, as opposed to other general economic factors, which is a requisite for receiving the special COVID-19 short-time work compensation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kurzarbeitsentschädigung Arbeitszeitrichtlinie Handelsgesellschaft Krankentaggeld Rückerstattung der Krankenversicherung Wirtschaftliche Tätigkeiten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs for the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 109 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Covid-19 Kurzarbeitsentschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: