Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2020 96 • VG SZ II 2020 96 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Contributions for Non-Employed Person Based on Entire Income

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding contributions for a non-employed person for the years 2015 and 2016 under the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance scheme. The appellant contested the assessment of contributions by the compensation office, arguing that certain income, which was not subject to tax, should not have been included in the calculation for determining the obligation to pay contributions as a non-employed person. The court reasoned that the law mandates the calculation of contributions based on the entire income, including non-taxable income derived from assets, in determining whether the threshold for being considered non-employed and thus subject to the contribution obligation has been met, thereby upholding the assessment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Contributions for Non-Employed Person Based on Entire Income: The appellant contested the assessment of contributions by the compensation office, arguing that certain income, which was not subject to tax, should not have been included in the calculation for determining the obligation to pay contributions as a non-employed person. The court reasoned that the law mandates the calculation of contributions based on the entire income, including non-taxable income derived from assets, in determining whether the threshold for being considered non-employed and thus subject to the contribution obligation has been met, thereby upholding the assessment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einkommensberechnung Beitragspflicht Steuerpflichtige Beitragsjahr Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung Steuerveranlagungen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 1. Februar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung \n (Beiträge Nichterwerbstätige 2015 und 2016) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: