Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2020 86 • VG SZ II 2020 86 KI-generiert

Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 86
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The dispute concerns a claim for supplementary benefits where the claimant appealed a decision regarding the mandatory waiver of assets. The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen Vermögensübertragung Verzicht auf Versicherungsleistungen Eigentumsnachweis Beweislast Verbot des Zusammentreffens von Leistungen Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: