Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2020 85 • VG SZ II 2020 85 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 85
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, debts, and property income, after the initial authority determined that the claimant's assets, including an apartment occupied by the claimant and their spouse, were not fully exhausted or deemed inconsequential for benefit eligibility. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen Vermögensertrag Einkommensverzicht Anspruchsvoraussetzung für Versicherungsleistungen bewohntes Grundstück Rückforderung von Leistungen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 85 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht / Schulden / \n Liegenschaftseinnahmen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: