Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2020 59 • VG SZ II 2020 59 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant sought compensation under the loss of earnings ordinance related to COVID-19, but the initial administrative ruling denied the benefit, leading to an appeal. The court reasoned that the relevant law concerning occupational disability benefits during the pandemic required the applicant to have been demonstrably incapable of working due to the specific health risks or protective measures associated with the virus, and since the claimant failed to establish such a documented incapacity to work during the claim period, the administrative decision denying the compensation was upheld.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal): The court reasoned that the relevant law concerning occupational disability benefits during the pandemic required the applicant to have been demonstrably incapable of working due to the specific health risks or protective measures associated with the virus, and since the claimant failed to establish such a documented incapacity to work during the claim period, the administrative decision denying the compensation was upheld.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwerbsausfallentschädigung Leistungen bei Erwerbsunfähigkeit Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben Gesundheitsschutz am Arbeitsplatz Nutzen und Gefahr Krankentaggeld Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsausfall) | Erwerbsersatzordnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is rejected because the appeal against the decision of the Cantonal Court is dismissed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was rejected.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsausfall) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: