Unemployment Insurance Daily Allowances and Employer-Like Status
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appeal concerned a dispute over unemployment insurance daily allowances, specifically relating to the claimant's work status, which was described as "employer-like." The appellant contested a decision regarding the calculation or eligibility for these allowances, but the provided text is highly fragmented and only identifies the parties, the subject matter (unemployment insurance, daily allowances, employer-like position), and the date of the decision, offering no substantive facts about the situation or the court's reasoning for its verdict.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertUnemployment Insurance Daily Allowances and Employer-Like Status: The appeal concerned a dispute over unemployment insurance daily allowances, specifically relating to the claimant's work status, which was described as "employer-like." The appellant contested a decision regarding the calculation or eligibility for these allowances, but the provided text is highly fragmented and only identifies the parties, the subject matter (unemployment insurance, daily allowances, employer-like position), and the date of the decision, offering no substantive facts about the situation or the court's reasoning for its verdict.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 55 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. August 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Taggelder; arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: