Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2020 51 • VG SZ II 2020 51 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 51
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an appeal against a decision by the employment office's unemployment insurance fund regarding the claimant's entitlement to unemployment benefits following the termination of their employment, where the central issue was the validity of the dismissal and the resulting eligibility for benefits. The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal: The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenentschädigung Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses Anspruch auf Versicherungsleistungen Wiederaufleben des Anspruchs Arbeitslosenkasse Arbeitslosigkeit
KI-generiert
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 66
Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 51 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n