Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant appealed a decision by the social insurance institution that calculated supplementary benefits based on a hypothetical earned income for the claimant's spouse, asserting the spouse had voluntarily foregone income. The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertSocial Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income: The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 50 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. September 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (hypothetisches Erwerbseinkommen \n der Ehefrau) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: