Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2020 48 • VG SZ II 2020 48 KI-generiert

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 48
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an appeal against a decision by the Labor Office concerning the cessation of entitlement to unemployment benefits. The appellant challenged the administrative decision that terminated their right to receive benefits. The court ultimately upheld the decision, reasoning that the facts presented and the relevant statutory provisions supported the administrative finding that the conditions for the continued entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits were no longer met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation: The appellant challenged the administrative decision that terminated their right to receive benefits. The court ultimately upheld the decision, reasoning that the facts presented and the relevant statutory provisions supported the administrative finding that the conditions for the continued entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits were no longer met.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arbeitslosenentschädigung Leistungseinstellung Anspruch auf Versicherungsleistungen ungerechtfertigte Entlassung Arbeitsverwaltung Arbeitslosigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG
The appeal was dismissed, and costs were imposed in accordance with this article.
KI-generiert
II 2021 24
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefits Cessation
II 2020 51
Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2020 18
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefits Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal was dismissed, and costs were imposed in accordance with this article.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 48 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchs­berechtigung;