Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2020 30 • VG SZ II 2020 30 KI-generiert

Tax Security Order Appeal Validity

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 30
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a security order issued by the finance department's tax office regarding income and property tax. The appellant, having previously been subject to a tax assessment that was partially upheld on appeal, subsequently filed a new appeal against the related security order. The court determined that a security order, which is an interim measure to secure future tax claims, remains a valid administrative act subject to appeal even if the underlying main tax assessment has been addressed through prior proceedings, reasoning that the security measure serves an independent purpose in securing potential future liabilities separate from the final determination of the exact tax amount.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Tax Security Order Appeal Validity: The appellant, having previously been subject to a tax assessment that was partially upheld on appeal, subsequently filed a new appeal against the related security order. The court determined that a security order, which is an interim measure to secure future tax claims, remains a valid administrative act subject to appeal even if the underlying main tax assessment has been addressed through prior proceedings, reasoning that the security measure serves an independent purpose in securing potential future liabilities separate from the final determination of the exact tax amount.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sicherung der Steuerforderung Rechtsbeständigkeit der Steuerveranlagung vorsorgliche Massnahme Steuerpflicht Liegenschaftssteuer Einkommensermittlung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Abteilung Finanzen, Steueramt (Bezugsbehörde), \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Sicherstellungsverfügung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: