Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2020 26 • VG SZ II 2020 26 KI-generiert

Judicial Review of Unemployment Benefit Denial for Voluntary Termination

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 26
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An applicant sought judicial review against a decision by the unemployment insurance fund concerning the refusal of unemployment benefits following the termination of their employment relationship. The court reasoned that the applicant's voluntary termination of the employment relationship without a valid reason justified the imposition of a sanction, which included a suspension of benefit payments, and therefore upheld the fund's decision to deny benefits for the prescribed period.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Judicial Review of Unemployment Benefit Denial for Voluntary Termination: The court reasoned that the applicant's voluntary termination of the employment relationship without a valid reason justified the imposition of a sanction, which included a suspension of benefit payments, and therefore upheld the fund's decision to deny benefits for the prescribed period.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses selbstverschuldete Arbeitslosigkeit Normenkontrolle Sistierung der Versicherungsleistung Arbeitslosenversicherungsorgan Arbeitslosenversicherung
KI-generiert
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2022 13
Judicial Review of Unemployment Insurance Fund Decision Dismissed for Non-Admissibility
II 2023 17
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial After Voluntary Termination Followed by Subsequent Employment Termination
II 2023 75
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Overturned Due to Insufficient Investigation of Mutual Termination Circumstances
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 26 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. März 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsteller, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Unia Arbeitslosenkasse, Kompetenzzentrum D-CH West, \n Monbijoustrasse 61, Postfach 3398, 3001 Bern, \n Gesuchsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n