Old Age and Survivors' Insurance Contribution Status Dispute
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case concerns a dispute over the status of contributions to the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance program, where an individual appealed a decision regarding their contribution liability. The court reasoned that the claimant, while employed by a company, was effectively operating as an economically dependent representative of another entity and was therefore not subject to mandatory insurance as an employee under the relevant law, as the relationship did not meet the legal criteria for an employment contract.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertOld Age and Survivors' Insurance Contribution Status Dispute: The court reasoned that the claimant, while employed by a company, was effectively operating as an economically dependent representative of another entity and was therefore not subject to mandatory insurance as an employee under the relevant law, as the relationship did not meet the legal criteria for an employment contract.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 2 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Juli 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. F.S.________, \n3. M.________ GmbH, \n4. T.________ AG, \n Beigeladene, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Beitragsstatus) |\n \n\n
\n Sachverhalt: