Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2020 114 • VG SZ II 2020 114 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Self-Employed Social Insurance Contributions and Default Interest (2015)

Geschäftsnummer II 2020 114
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by a social insurance fund regarding contributions for a self-employed individual and default interest for the year 2015 under the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance scheme. The court's reasoning, not fully detailed in the provided excerpt but implied by the subject matter, would focus on whether the appellant was correctly classified as self-employed and whether the calculation and assessment of the required contributions and associated default interest for that period were legally sound under the relevant insurance regulations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 3 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Self-Employed Social Insurance Contributions and Default Interest (2015): The court's reasoning, not fully detailed in the provided excerpt but implied by the subject matter, would focus on whether the appellant was correctly classified as self-employed and whether the calculation and assessment of the required contributions and associated default interest for that period were legally sound under the relevant insurance regulations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verzugszinsen Altersversicherung Beitragsberechnung Versicherungskasse Beitrag an Selbständigerwerbende Sozialversicherungsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 3 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the decision being appealed violated any constitutional or legal right.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The costs of the federal proceedings are imposed on the appellant who lost the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 114 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marcel Käselau, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Beiträge für \n Selbständigerwerbende und Verzugszinsen 2015) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: