Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 96 • VG SZ II 2019 96 KI-generiert

Company v. Civil Engineering Office Regarding Benefit Levy for Reconstruction

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A company appealed a decision by the civil engineering office concerning causality-based charges levied after receiving a building permit for the demolition and reconstruction of a structure, specifically challenging a benefit levy. The court considered whether the nature of the charges imposed by the authority, stemming from the building permit granting rights for a new construction on the site of a demolished one, constituted a fee or levy based on specific benefits derived from the governmental action, ultimately upholding the imposition of the benefit levy based on the relevant legal framework concerning development charges.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Company v. Civil Engineering Office Regarding Benefit Levy for Reconstruction: The court considered whether the nature of the charges imposed by the authority, stemming from the building permit granting rights for a new construction on the site of a demolished one, constituted a fee or levy based on specific benefits derived from the governmental action, ultimately upholding the imposition of the benefit levy based on the relevant legal framework concerning development charges.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bauunternehmen Abbruchbewilligung Erschliessungsbeiträge Tiefbauvertrag Unternehmensstruktur Hofstattrecht
KI-generiert
II 2024 11
Construction Company Benefit Levy Challenge
ZK1 2019 10
Property Owners' Association v. Construction Company (Structural Damage and Unauthorized Encroachment)
II 2017 42
Company v. Local Council: Benefit Levy Appeal
III 2018 74
Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality
III 2022 139
Public Procurement Appeal Over Flawed Civil Engineering Works Award

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Tiefbauamt, Postfach 1251, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Baubewilligung Abbruch und Neubau: \n Vorteilsabgabe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: