Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2019 9 • VG SZ II 2019 9 KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Recovery Due to Concurrent Retirement Allowance

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 9
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned an appeal against a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the crediting of a retirement benefit and subsequent recovery of benefits. The appellant had received unemployment insurance benefits but was later required to repay them because they had also received a retirement allowance. The court reasoned that the receipt of the retirement benefit, which was designed to replace earned income, disqualified the individual from simultaneously receiving unemployment insurance benefits intended for those who are involuntarily unemployed and available for work, thereby justifying the fund's decision to reclaim the paid benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Recovery Due to Concurrent Retirement Allowance: The appellant had received unemployment insurance benefits but was later required to repay them because they had also received a retirement allowance. The court reasoned that the receipt of the retirement benefit, which was designed to replace earned income, disqualified the individual from simultaneously receiving unemployment insurance benefits intended for those who are involuntarily unemployed and available for work, thereby justifying the fund's decision to reclaim the paid benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Versicherungsleistung der Arbeitslosenversicherung Pensionierung Erwerbseinkommen Arbeitslosigkeit Versicherungskasse Rückforderung von Leistungen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ (Arbeitslosenkasse), \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anrechnung einer Altersleistung; \n Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: