Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 75 • VG SZ II 2019 75 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 75
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant, appealing a decision regarding supplementary benefits, challenged a requirement to relinquish assets, arguing that the relevant provision did not apply to assets derived from the liquidation of a primary residence since they were intended for the acquisition of a new dwelling. The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provision required the surrender of all assets exceeding the statutory minimum for supplementary benefit eligibility, regardless of the intended future use of the liquidated asset proceeds, thereby upholding the decision of the lower instance that mandated the claimant's asset divestment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that the relevant statutory provision required the surrender of all assets exceeding the statutory minimum for supplementary benefit eligibility, regardless of the intended future use of the liquidated asset proceeds, thereby upholding the decision of the lower instance that mandated the claimant's asset divestment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vermögensverzicht Ergänzungsleistungen Versicherungsleistungsanspruch Leistungskürzung Mindestleistungen statutarische Leistung Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the appeal.
KI-generiert
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: