Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 68 • VG SZ II 2019 68 KI-generiert

Plaintiff v. Pension Fund and Bankruptcy Office Claim Priority Dispute

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 68
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A plaintiff sued a pension fund and a bankruptcy office, likely concerning a claim arising from insolvency proceedings, where the central dispute involved the priority or entitlement to certain assets or claims held by the defendant pension fund. The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, would involve interpreting relevant statutory provisions regarding pension fund obligations, creditor rights in bankruptcy, and the specific contractual or legal basis of the plaintiff's claim against the fund to determine the proper outcome of the litigation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Plaintiff v. Pension Fund and Bankruptcy Office Claim Priority Dispute: The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, would involve interpreting relevant statutory provisions regarding pension fund obligations, creditor rights in bankruptcy, and the specific contractual or legal basis of the plaintiff's claim against the fund to determine the proper outcome of the litigation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Konkursprivileg Rentenanspruch Pensionsfonds Vertragliche Rechte und Pflichten Sozialversicherungsstreitigkeit gesetzliche Grundlage
KI-generiert
II 2018 107
Pension Institution v. Employer: Recovery of Unpaid Pension Contributions
II 2019 91
Pension Fund v. Employer: Occupational Pension Contributions Dispute
II 2019 2
Pension Fund v. Employer: Unsubstantiated Dispute Over Pension Contributions
I 2017 76
Pension Fund Benefit Reduction Notice Dispute
ZK 2006 74
Managing Director Wage Priority in Bankruptcy

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 68 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________ (Vorsorgestiftung), \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Konkursamt E.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n