Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 62 • VG SZ II 2019 62 KI-generiert

Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 62
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant challenged a decision by the employment office regarding the cessation of entitlement to unemployment benefits. The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation: The appellant had previously received unemployment insurance benefits but subsequently relocated and reported difficulty finding new employment in the new location. The court reasoned that the obligation to accept suitable employment is a central tenet of the unemployment insurance scheme, and the appellant’s failure to actively seek employment within a reasonable radius of their residence and to cooperate with placement efforts justified the discontinuation of benefits, as the duty to seek work remains irrespective of a change in residence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arbeitslosenentschädigung Schadenminderungspflicht bei Arbeitslosigkeit Leistungseinstellung Anspruch auf Versicherungsleistungen Aufenthaltswechsel verursachter Arbeitsplatzverlust

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Imposed costs on the appeal filed by the appellant.
KI-generiert
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2025 61
Unemployment Benefit Entitlement Following Voluntary Job Cessation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed costs on the appeal filed by the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 62 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: