Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 58 • VG SZ II 2019 58 KI-generiert

Taxation of Securities Trading Profits vs. Private Asset Management

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 58
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an income and property tax assessment for the year 2014, specifically addressing whether the appellant engaged in professional securities trading, which would subject their capital gains to income tax rather than being treated as tax-exempt private asset management. The core issue was whether the volume, frequency, and timing of securities transactions, coupled with the use of short-term financing, demonstrated an intent and pattern characteristic of commercial trading rather than mere portfolio adjustments. The court found that the extensive and rapid turnover of securities, facilitated by short-term borrowing, crossed the threshold from private asset management to professional trading, thereby affirming the tax authority's decision to tax the resulting profits as professional income.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Taxation of Securities Trading Profits vs. Private Asset Management: The core issue was whether the volume, frequency, and timing of securities transactions, coupled with the use of short-term financing, demonstrated an intent and pattern characteristic of commercial trading rather than mere portfolio adjustments. The court found that the extensive and rapid turnover of securities, facilitated by short-term borrowing, crossed the threshold from private asset management to professional trading, thereby affirming the tax authority's decision to tax the resulting profits as professional income.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Besteuerung des Kapitalgewinns Effektenhandel private Vermögensverwaltung Warenumsatzsteuer Einkommenssteuerveranlagung Steuerbehörde

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.
KI-generiert
II 2019 51
Taxpayer v. Cantonal Tax Commission (2015 Income Tax Assessment on Securities Trading)
II 2021 45
Tax on Liquidation Gain Real Estate Valuation Dispute
III 2022 176
Taxable Income Determination: Capital Gains as Business Income
II 2020 80
Taxation of Unrealized Capital Gains Upon Share Transfer to Holding Company
II 2021 126
Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Capital Gain from Isolated Sale of Immovable Property

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the final order concerning the allocation of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 58 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. Erben der E., \n B.________, \n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. C.________, \n3. D.________, \n4. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Veranlagung 2014; \n gewerbsmässiger Wertschriftenhandel) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: