Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 30 • VG SZ II 2019 30 KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 30
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appeal concerned the denial of supplementary benefits due to the claimant's refusal to waive ownership of an asset. The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal: The court reasoned that the relevant law permits the refusal of supplementary benefits when the applicant disposes of assets without legitimate reason, and the forfeiture of an asset, even if for a seemingly non-monetary consideration, can be deemed a disposal without legitimate reason if it results in an undue burden on the social security system, thus upholding the prior decision regarding the ineligibility for benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verwirkung Ergänzungsleistungen Vermögen Sozialleistung Anfechtung der Vermögensübertragung Anspruchsvoraussetzung für Versicherungsleistungen Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
KI-generiert
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 84
Appeal Regarding Imputed Asset Waiver Denial for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal
II 2024 112
Claimant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputed Wealth from Unexplained Asset Decreases

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: