Pension Fund v. Limited Liability Company: Occupational Pension Insurance Obligation
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA pension fund sued a limited liability company to recover outstanding pension contributions and lift a legal objection raised by the defendant against the payment order. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court's decision, reasoning that the defendant was not subject to the mandatory occupational pension insurance scheme for the relevant employees because they were employed solely outside the jurisdiction of the relevant insurance scheme at the time the insurance obligation arose, meaning the employer was not legally required to participate in the fund.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertPension Fund v. Limited Liability Company: Occupational Pension Insurance Obligation: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court's decision, reasoning that the defendant was not subject to the mandatory occupational pension insurance scheme for the relevant employees because they were employed solely outside the jurisdiction of the relevant insurance scheme at the time the insurance obligation arose, meaning the employer was not legally required to participate in the fund.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 23 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 17. April 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ (Sammelstiftung), \n c/o B.________ AG, \n Klägerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ GmbH, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Beiträge; Beseitigung Rechtsvorschlag) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: