Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2019 20 • VG SZ II 2019 20 KI-generiert

Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility

Geschäftsnummer II 2019 20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought supplementary benefits but was denied because the relevant compensation fund considered a voluntary waiver of assets made prior to the application to be a form of self-provision that precluded eligibility. The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility: The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sozialversicherungsleistungen Vermögen Verzicht auf Versicherungsleistungen Ausgleichsfonds Konkursbeschlag Erschleichen einer Leistung Ergänzungsleistungen | java.util.HashMap/1797211028

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
KI-generiert
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 30
Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.oec. HSG B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: