Second Home Occupancy Tax Validity Challenge
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertTaxpayers challenged a local council's decision to levy a supplementary occupancy tax (Kurtaxe) on second homes, arguing that the local bylaw authorizing the tax was invalid because it was not properly published, leading to a procedural defect. The court reasoned that the bylaw was effectively published through public display and notice in the official gazette, satisfying the legal requirements for public accessibility and validity, and therefore the supplementary tax assessment was lawful.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertSecond Home Occupancy Tax Validity Challenge: The court reasoned that the bylaw was effectively published through public display and notice in the official gazette, satisfying the legal requirements for public accessibility and validity, and therefore the supplementary tax assessment was lawful.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 93 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. November 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, 3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Muotathal, Hauptstrasse 48, Postfach 142, 6436 Muotathal, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Öffentliche Abgaben (Kurtaxe Zweitwohnungen; 2. Rechtsgang \n i.S. II 2017 29 / 30 / 31) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: