Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2018 92 • VG SZ II 2018 92 KI-generiert

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld

Geschäftsnummer II 2018 92
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A policyholder sought court review after an insurer terminated their mandatory sickness daily allowance insurance policy under the Federal Health Insurance Act, following the policyholder's failure to pay outstanding premiums. The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld: The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Versicherer Kündigung obligatorische Krankenpflegeversicherung Zahlungspflicht Krankentaggeld Sistierung der Versicherungsleistung
KI-generiert
II 2020 88
Claimants v. Insurer Regarding Supplemental Health Insurance Termination Date
I 2012 8
Insurer's Right to Terminate for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition
I 2024 21
Insurer Upheld in Terminating Accident Benefits Due to Pre-existing Condition
ZK1 2021 45
Employer Liability for Unpaid Sickness Benefits Offset by Insurer Payment
I 2018 76
Insurance Provider v. Injured Worker (Benefits Cessation)

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Taggeldversicherung nach KVG; Vertragsauflösung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: