Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2018 65 • VG SZ II 2018 65 KI-generiert

Family Equalization Fund Contribution Calculation Dispute

Geschäftsnummer II 2018 65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a decision by a family equalization fund, which concerned the calculation of their professional contributions. The court reasoned that when determining the contribution base, the fund was correct to consider the professional income earned during the entire period of employment for which the contribution was being calculated, even if the employment relationship was terminated before the end of the relevant period, as the obligation to pay contributions arose from the employment relationship itself.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Family Equalization Fund Contribution Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that when determining the contribution base, the fund was correct to consider the professional income earned during the entire period of employment for which the contribution was being calculated, even if the employment relationship was terminated before the end of the relevant period, as the obligation to pay contributions arose from the employment relationship itself.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einkommensberechnung Beitragsdauer Arbeitsverhältnis Familienausgleichskasse Zahlungspflicht Finanzausgleich Familienzulagen (Auszahlung an Arbeitnehmer) | Familienzulagen
KI-generiert
II 2020 53
Social Security Contribution Calculation Dispute
II 2020 56
Social Security Contribution Calculation Dispute and Procedural Compliance
II 2020 60
Appeal of Family Equalization Fund Decision on 2018 Allowances
II 2018 34
Social Security Fund Reimbursement Liability Based on Payment Date
II 2019 2
Pension Fund v. Employer: Unsubstantiated Dispute Over Pension Contributions

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 65 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Familienausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, \n Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n