Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, where the appellant sought these benefits. The core issue was whether the claimant was required to renounce assets to qualify for the supplementary benefits as determined by the lower instance. The court likely analyzed the relevant social security regulations concerning asset disposal requirements for eligibility for such benefits and whether the appellant met or failed to meet those specific conditions, leading to the final determination on the entitlement.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver: The core issue was whether the claimant was required to renounce assets to qualify for the supplementary benefits as determined by the lower instance. The court likely analyzed the relevant social security regulations concerning asset disposal requirements for eligibility for such benefits and whether the appellant met or failed to meet those specific conditions, leading to the final determination on the entitlement.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 43 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: