Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2018 42 • VG SZ II 2018 42 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Non-Final Decision on Damages in Social Security Case

Geschäftsnummer II 2018 42
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by a social security fund regarding disability insurance, specifically concerning a claim for damages. The court reasoned that the administrative decision under review did not constitute a final judgment on the claim for damages, as the administrative proceedings concerning the damages were still ongoing, thus the appeal against the specific decision was inadmissible as it lacked a final decision regarding the requested damages.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Non-Final Decision on Damages in Social Security Case: The court reasoned that the administrative decision under review did not constitute a final judgment on the claim for damages, as the administrative proceedings concerning the damages were still ongoing, thus the appeal against the specific decision was inadmissible as it lacked a final decision regarding the requested damages.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sozialversicherungsverfahren Invaliditätsversicherung Ausgleichskasse Einstellung von Invalidenleistungen Schadensersatzklage Anspruchsvoraussetzung für Versicherungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision governs the allocation of court costs in the final decision.
KI-generiert
I 2017 89
Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2017 108
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2020 53
Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits Determination
I 2019 71
Claimant v. Social Insurance Institution: Disability Pension Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision governs the allocation of court costs in the final decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz nach