Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, where the lower court had determined that certain assets needed to be relinquished. The court reasoned that the statutory provisions governing supplementary benefits mandate the exhaustion of private means before public assistance can be granted, and therefore upheld the requirement for the claimant to surrender the specified assets to qualify for the benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 zweiter Satz BGG; Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver: The court reasoned that the statutory provisions governing supplementary benefits mandate the exhaustion of private means before public assistance can be granted, and therefore upheld the requirement for the claimant to surrender the specified assets to qualify for the benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 35 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n
\n \n