Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2018 32 • VG SZ II 2018 32 KI-generiert

Cantonal Tax Assessment Challenge Regarding Asset Depreciation vs. Immediate Deduction

Geschäftsnummer II 2018 32
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Taxpayers challenged a cantonal tax assessment for the tax period 2018, arguing that certain investment costs should be fully deductible as business expenses rather than being amortized over several years, as determined by the tax authority. The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the contested investments, relating to a business activity, constituted assets that do not rapidly lose value and therefore must be subject to proportional depreciation over time according to established tax principles, not immediate full deduction.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Cantonal Tax Assessment Challenge Regarding Asset Depreciation vs. Immediate Deduction: The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the contested investments, relating to a business activity, constituted assets that do not rapidly lose value and therefore must be subject to proportional depreciation over time according to established tax principles, not immediate full deduction.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
steuerrechtliche Abschreibung Pro-rata-Satz des Vorsteuerabzugs geschäftlicher Aufwand Geschäftsvermögen Kostenfestsetzung Steuerbehörde
KI-generiert
II 2019 72
Taxpayer v. Cantonal Tax Authority: Deductibility of Pre-Opening Operating Expenses
II 2020 122
Cantonal Tax Assessment Appeal (2018 Income and Wealth Tax)
II 2018 105
Taxpayer's Deduction of Costs for Demolished Building in Capital Gains Calculation
II 2020 119
Taxpayer v. Cantonal Tax Authority (Legal vs. Beneficial Ownership in Wealth Tax)
II 2019 70
Taxpayer Appeal: Deductibility of Professional Expenses

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 32 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt …, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission, Bahnhofstrasse 15, \n Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n