Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2017 32 • VG SZ II 2017 32 KI-generiert

Unemployment Benefit Reimbursement Appeal and Waiver Denial

Geschäftsnummer II 2017 32
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought reimbursement of unemployment benefits due to a suspension of benefits following an administrative decision, appealing the decision which upheld the reimbursement obligation and rejected a request for a waiver. The court reasoned that the appellant, having received benefits for which they were not entitled because they failed to report essential changes in their situation as required by law, was obliged to repay the excess funds, and the circumstances did not warrant a waiver of repayment as the administrative error was not solely attributable to the authority.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Benefit Reimbursement Appeal and Waiver Denial: The court reasoned that the appellant, having received benefits for which they were not entitled because they failed to report essential changes in their situation as required by law, was obliged to repay the excess funds, and the circumstances did not warrant a waiver of repayment as the administrative error was not solely attributable to the authority.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückerstattung von Arbeitslosengeldern Einstellung der Leistungen Rückerstattungspflicht Verzicht auf Lohnansprüche Arbeitslosigkeit Kanzleiversehen
KI-generiert
II 2021 102
Unemployment Insurance Eligibility Appeal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 67
Appeal Regarding Remittance of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Repayment Demand

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2017 32 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. August 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Markus Jakob, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Rückforderung Arbeitslosengelder, Erlass) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: