Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2025 3 • VG SZ I 2025 3 KI-generiert

Appellant v. Social Insurance Office: Vocational Rehabilitation Denial Appeal

Geschäftsnummer I 2025 3
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought vocational rehabilitation measures under invalid insurance, claiming a significant reduction in earning capacity following a medical condition, while the social insurance office had denied the request for such measures, maintaining the appellant was not medically fit to pursue rehabilitation or gainful employment. The court reasoned that although the appellant had significant health limitations, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the overall impact of the impairments met the required threshold for granting vocational rehabilitation measures under the applicable law, thus upholding the decision to deny the benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appellant v. Social Insurance Office: Vocational Rehabilitation Denial Appeal: The court reasoned that although the appellant had significant health limitations, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the overall impact of the impairments met the required threshold for granting vocational rehabilitation measures under the applicable law, thus upholding the decision to deny the benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
berufliche Rehabilitation Versicherungsleistungsbegehren Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung gesundheitliche Beeinträchtigung medizinische Gründe Erwerbstätigkeit
KI-generiert
I 2021 48
Vocational Rehabilitation Denial Appeal
I 2022 14
Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits
I 2017 23
Denial of Invalidity Pension Pending Vocational Rehabilitation
I 2020 3
Claimant v. Social Insurance Authority (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2025 3 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Mai 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. F.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: