Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2024 55 • VG SZ I 2024 55 KI-generiert

Insurance Coverage Dispute: Competitive Skiing Injury and Policy Exclusion

Geschäftsnummer I 2024 55
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought a declaration of insurance coverage for an accident, claiming injury sustained while participating in a competitive skiing event, which the initial decision denied because the activity was deemed inherently dangerous, thus falling under an exclusion clause for high-risk sports. The court reviewed whether the specific nature and conditions of the event negated the application of the exclusion, reasoning that although competitive skiing is inherently risky, the specific circumstances of the appellant's injury did not exclusively arise from the exceptional danger contemplated by the policy exclusion, leading to the partial overturn of the prior ruling regarding the initial claim's validity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Coverage Dispute: Competitive Skiing Injury and Policy Exclusion: The court reviewed whether the specific nature and conditions of the event negated the application of the exclusion, reasoning that although competitive skiing is inherently risky, the specific circumstances of the appellant's injury did not exclusively arise from the exceptional danger contemplated by the policy exclusion, leading to the partial overturn of the prior ruling regarding the initial claim's validity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Unfallversicherungsdeckung Versicherungsvorbehalt Versicherungsvertrag Teilklage sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit direktes Forderungsrecht gegen den Versicherer
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2024 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungsanspruch; 2. Rechtsgang \n im Verfahren I 2023 1) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: