Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2023 8 • VG SZ I 2023 8 KI-generiert

Disability Pension Denial Upheld on Vocational Capacity Assessment

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 8
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged a decision by the social insurance authority denying them a disability pension, arguing that their residual earning capacity had been incorrectly assessed following an accident, despite continued medically verifiable symptoms affecting their ability to work across various sectors. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that, despite their reduced capacity, they could no longer secure any gainful employment in a field suited to their abilities, age, and training, thus concluding that the legally required threshold for awarding a disability pension had not been met based on the overall vocational rehabilitation assessment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG; Disability Pension Denial Upheld on Vocational Capacity Assessment: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that, despite their reduced capacity, they could no longer secure any gainful employment in a field suited to their abilities, age, and training, thus concluding that the legally required threshold for awarding a disability pension had not been met based on the overall vocational rehabilitation assessment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenrente Beurteilung der Arbeitsfähigkeit berufliche Rehabilitation Erwerbstätigkeit verminderte Erwerbsfähigkeit ständige berufliche Weiterbildung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited in the dispositive to reject the appeal in terms of costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n C.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, D.________ 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: