Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2023 79 • VG SZ I 2023 79 KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Causal Link to Disability

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 79
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision concerning accident insurance benefits, where the core dispute involved the causal link between an alleged work accident and the resulting disability claim. The court reasoned that for a claim to be granted under accident insurance, the alleged harmful event must have demonstrably caused the asserted health impairment, and since the medical evidence failed to establish a necessary or even likely causal relationship between the reported incident and the claimant's ongoing physical complaints, the appeal against the prior rejection of benefits was ultimately dismissed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG, Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG, Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG, Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG, Art. 68 Abs. 2 BVG; Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Causal Link to Disability: The court reasoned that for a claim to be granted under accident insurance, the alleged harmful event must have demonstrably caused the asserted health impairment, and since the medical evidence failed to establish a necessary or even likely causal relationship between the reported incident and the claimant's ongoing physical complaints, the appeal against the prior rejection of benefits was ultimately dismissed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Leistung der Invalidenversicherung Kranken- und Unfallversicherung Kausalzusammenhang gesundheitliche Beeinträchtigung medizinische Gründe Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG
The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury.
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG
The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link.
Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG
The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.
Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.
Art. 68 Abs. 2 BVG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the respondent legal costs.
KI-generiert
I 2019 32
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Appeal
I 2020 64
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Appeal
I 2023 6
Insurance Appeal: Causal Link in Accident Benefits
I 2020 57
Appeal Regarding Accident Insurance Benefits and Disability Assessment
I 2022 45
Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal: Causal Link in Shoulder Injury Claim

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury.

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link.

Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.

Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the respondent legal costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungsanspruch / Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: